CoverUp's

The Irish Times `papal talks' story unfounded

Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:49:15 +1000

Tag: ireland

By Garry O'Sullivan Editor

It seemed like an amazing scoop for The Irish Times newspaper last week when it was able to reveal that not only was Dublin's Archbishop Martin still in favour with the Pope but that he had recently had 'exhaustive discussions' with the Pope who backed him fully on his strategy in Dublin.

The report was made from Rimini in Italy where Archbishop Martin was giving a speech to a gathering of Communion and Liberation members.

Story Continues below

Please Help keep this site free by clicking on our sponsors

Those back in Ireland who speculated that Archbishop Martin might have been embarrassed by the Vatican decision not to accept the resignations of his two auxiliary bishops were told by The Irish Times sources that they were out of touch with what was really going on in Italy and the Vatican.

The problem with this is that Archbishop Martin did not meet the Pope recently when he was in Italy. Nor did he have a discussion with him. In fact, the Pope has not met Archbishop Martin or Cardinal Brady since he met all the Irish bishops last February nor has the Pope had any discussions with the Archbishop since then. In response to questions from this paper, a spokeswoman for the Archbishop of Dublin confirmed this saying that ''The archbishop hasn't had any discussions with the Pope since the bishop's meeting last February.''

http://www.bishop-accountability.org/...e/2010/09/

Belgian cardinal defamed by abuse cover-up

Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:52:05 +1000

Tag: belgium

The former head of the Belgian Catholic church was defamed by a newspaper report accusing him of trying to cover up the sexual abuse of a minor by the former bishop of Bruges, his lawyer said.

Story Continues below

Please Help keep this site free by clicking on our sponsors

The Flemish daily De Standaard published on Saturday the transcripts of a conversation taped on April 8 between Cardinal Godfried Danneels, the victim and Roger Vangheluwe, who was still bishop at the time.

In the tape, Danneels, who headed the church between 1979-2009, asks the victim to accept an apology from Vangheluwe, or at least not make his allegations public
until the bishop retired a year later.

The cardinal’s attorney, Fernand Keuleneer, said on Tuesday that De Standaard “voluntarily and deliberately defamed” Danneels by selecting certain extracts and underlining passages of the transcript in red.

Danneels had not been able to prepare for the confrontation and his reactions had been “instantaneous,” the attorney said in a statement published on the website of the Catholic daily Tertio.

“Like any person in that situation, he then wanted to continue to think more at length about these issues in view of a second meeting that never took place,” Keuleneer said.

“This has nothing to do with a plot or a cover-up. Cardinal Danneels listened and thought about it, without a result,” he said. “Two weeks later, Monsignor Vangheluwe resigned. Cardinal Danneels had also come to the conclusion that that was the only adequate way of proceeding.”

Tertio reported that De Standaard refused to published the attorney’s response.

Vangheluwe resigned on April 23, admitting he had sexually abused “a boy in my entourage” about 20 years earlier. According to De Standaard, he did this after a relative of the victim emailed all Belgian bishops demanding he quit by late May.

Danneels has rejected accusations that he had known about the abuse for a long time and denied trying to keep them quiet.

Last month Danneels was questioned by police for more than 10 hours as part of a probe into sexual abuse by priests.

Belgium is one of the countries worst hit by a rising tide of revelations of paedophilia by Roman Catholic priests in Europe and North America.

http://theindependent.mu/2010/09/02/b...-cover-up/

Under-fire Irish Cardinal vows to join Pope on visit to Britain

Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:55:06 +1000

Tag: england
Tag: ireland

Cardinal Seán Brady has faced widespread criticism over his handling of a clergy child abuse scandal, and for his refusal to apologise after a priest was allowed to evade questioning over an IRA bombing.

Story Continues below

Please Help keep this site free by clicking on our sponsors

But he defiantly told an Irish newspaper that he would not be stepping down and that he hoped to attend many of the engagements during Benedict XVI’s historic state visit to Scotland and England in three weeks’ time.

“I plan to accompany Pope Benedict in Edinburgh, Glasgow, London and Birmingham,” said Cardinal Brady, the head of the church in Ireland.

His presence at public events in Britain will likely lead to increase turnout at protests, as the country’s Roman Catholic church has so far escaped much of the criticism leveled at Ireland.

Terry Sanderson, President of the National Secular Society which is leading opposition to the Pontiff’s visit, said: “This graphically illustrates the innate arrogance of so many in the Catholic hierarchy.

“If the Pope permits Cardinal Brady to accompany him on his travels through the United Kingdom he will be giving tacit approval to the Cardinal’s disgraceful behaviour.

“How can we be convinced that Pope Benedict means what he says about clearing up the child abuse scandal when he permits someone with Cardinal Brady’s past to continue in office?”

It emerged earlier this year that Cardinal Brady, 71, was personally involved in the cover-up of clergy child abuse many years ago.

As a priest in Co Cavan in 1975, he had been present at meetings where young victims signed vows of silence over complaints against a notorious paedophile monk, Fr Brendan Smyth.

The Church claimed the boys were told to sign oaths “to avoid potential collusion” in an internal inquiry, but Cardinal Brady did not tell police about the crimes and Fr Smyth went on to abuse more children.

In his St Patrick’s Day Mass, Cardinal Brady apologised to those he had let down and added: "Looking back I am ashamed that I have not always upheld the values that I profess and believe in."

But although abuse survivors and politicians called on Cardinal Brady to resign, he did not.

He was rumoured to have tendered his resignation in Rome before Easter but insisted to the Irish Independent: "This is not true about my resigning. I am not resigning."

Cardinal Brady faced more criticism last week after a report by the police ombudsman found that the church hierarchy and the British government had colluded and allowed a priest suspected of involvement in the Claudy bombing, which killed nine people, to travel across the border from Northern Ireland to another parish rather than face justice.

The Cardinal issued a statement agreeing that Fr James Chesney’s terrorist activity was “shocking” but insisted there had been no cover-up.

http://clericalwhispers.blogspot.com/...-join.html

Bad News from the Netherlands

Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:30:46 +1000

Tag: netherlands

900 Victims of Sexual Abuse in Dutch Roman Catholic Church Register.

Story Continues below

Please Help keep this site free by clicking on our sponsors

Former Minister Win Deetman is Chairman of the commission of investigation into sexual abuse within the Roman Catholic Church.

He has announced that more than 900 victims have registered with the commission. Deetman said that he was greatly surprised that all these abuses have come to light only now as most took place years ago.

He said that he was shocked about a variety of stories which had never come in to the open saying “I hear and read things which go beyond my comprehension.

How can somebody do such things to children?”

www.nrc.nl/nieuwsthema/misbruik_kerk/...ij_Deetman

Catholic Church more interested in making excuses

Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:55:53 +1000

Tag: ireland

The Catholic Church has been accused of showing more interest in making excuses than dealing with the pain of victims in its response to the Claudy bombing report.

Story Continues below

Please Help keep this site free by clicking on our sponsors

It has been more than a week since the Police Ombudsman revealed the Church made a secret deal with the RUC and the British Government to prevent the arrest of Father James Chesney — the priest suspected of being an IRA leader and masterminding the 1972 atrocity — yet there has been no formal apology from the Church.

Last week a statement from Cardinal Sean Brady said the Church accepted the findings, but did not say sorry.

But this week the Catholic Communications Office released a statement in the name of former bishop Edward Daly, which called the findings into question and accused journalists of competing to write the most “lurid headlines”.

Bishop Daly stated: “I am not at all convinced that Father Chesney was involved in the Claudy bombing. I may be mistaken about that, but I do not think so.”

The Catholic Church’s response to the Claudy report has drawn comparisons to its handling of a series of allegations against priests of child sex abuse .

Fr Patrick McCafferty, who is originally from Belfast, said the Church has reverted to type in failing to address the concerns of victims.

He said: “I think it needs to be pointed out the Church has not been accused in this report of covering anything up. But they did cover up crimes against children, therefore it’s not so unbelievable that they would cover up something like this.

“Again the way they handle hurting human beings is often very unsatisfactory and that’s the shocking thing I think.

“Whether dealing with this atrocity or the victims of child abuse, the response is often dictated by covering their own actions and making excuses for themselves.

“It’s not focused on the pain and suffering of those who are coping with whatever form of trauma.”

Crisis communications specialist Nick Garbutt, from AsItIs Consulting, believes the Catholic Church should follow its own teachings and issue an apology.

“I don’t think there is any doubt or anybody has contested the fact that the Church spoke to the authorities and as a result of that Fr Chesney was moved,” he said.

“My point is that if you are faced with something like this, something that wasn’t moral, then you have to deal with it and have to step up and accept some responsibility for whatever it is you have done and apologise where appropriate — and I think this is certainly an instance where an apology is appropriate.”

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/new...z0yVCO1Fge

Retired cardinal in Belgium admits requesting silence from sex abuse victim

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:49:25 +1000

Tag: belgium

By Henry Chu, Los Angeles Times

Cardinal Godfried Danneels is heard on secret tapes urging a sexual abuse victim to stay quiet until the bishop who molested him over a span of 13 years could retire.

Story Continues below

Please Help keep this site free by clicking on our sponsors

Reporting from Brussels —

The former head of Belgium's Roman Catholic Church acknowledged Monday that he was wrong to have urged a sexual abuse victim to stay quiet until after the bishop who repeatedly molested him over a span of 13 years could retire.

The statement by Cardinal Godfried Danneels came after transcripts of secret tapes of a meeting between him and the now-grown victim were published over the weekend in two newspapers, causing an outcry in this predominantly Roman Catholic country.

"The whole approach … was not the right one," Danneels' spokesman, Toon Osaer, told the Associated Press on Monday.

Osaer quoted the cardinal as saying he had "been naive" and unprepared when he met the man last April to discuss the situation. The cleric's suggestions for dealing with the matter were "improvisation," Osaer said.

The uproar has added fuel to the ongoing sex abuse scandal in the Catholic Church in Europe and bolstered accusations that leaders have been more concerned about maintaining the church's reputation and silencing victims than solving the problem of clergy misconduct.

The victim in this case, who has not been named, was molested as a boy from 1973 to 1986 by his uncle, Roger Vangheluwe, a priest who became bishop of Bruges during that time. Vangheluwe has admitted to the abuse and he stepped down from his post shortly after the April 8 meeting between his nephew and Danneels.

By the time of that meeting, Danneels had been retired for three months as head of the church in Belgium. But Vangheluwe urged the cardinal to speak to his nephew, and Danneels agreed.

The conversation was recorded by the nephew without Danneels' knowledge. The cardinal has said that he regrets the man's decision to make their exchange public, but he does not dispute the authenticity of the conversation as reported over the weekend.

During the meeting, Danneels advised the man not to "make a lot of noise" about the abuse he suffered from his uncle, because Vangheluwe was scheduled to retire in a year anyway.

"It would be better that you wait," Danneels said. He also urged the man to forgive his uncle.

Osaer, the cardinal's spokesman, denied that Danneels intended that to be the end of the matter.

"It is not correct to say that Danneels implied, 'Let's give forgiveness and that's it,' " Osaer told the AP.

The scandal is the latest to envelop the church in Belgium, which is already the subject of a police investigation into allegations of abuse and of cover-ups by church leaders.

henry.chu@latimes.com

Copyright © 2010, Los Angeles Times

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwor...ld+News%29

Leaked Tapes with Catholic Sex Abuse Victim Make for Sad Reading

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:18:45 +1000

Tag: germany
Tag: youtube

Seized documents from Catholic Church’s offices in Belgium declared inadmissible

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:35:43 +1000

Tag: belgium

Seized documents from Catholic Church’s offices in Belgium declared inadmissible evidence in child sex abuse case

The judicial authorities will not be allowed to use the case files taken during a search of the Church Commission on Abuse by Clergymen. On the 24 June detectives searched a number of premises owned by the Catholic Church including the Commission’s offices in Leuven (Flemish Brabant).

Story Continues below

Please Help keep this site free by clicking on our sponsors

However, “serious procedural errors” were made by detectives that took part in what was called Operation Kelk.”

Consequently, the evidence contained in the 475 case files taken from the Commission’s offices can’t be used in the criminal investigation into child sex abuse by Catholic clergymen.

The decision to declare the evidence inadmissible was taken by Brussels magistrates two weeks ago.

However, it had been kept secret until it was leaked to journalists from the commercial broadcaster VTM.

The material taken during other searches, including the one at the Archbishop’s Palace, will be able to be used in the investigation.

Files to be sealed

The former Head of the Church Commission Peter Adriaenssens told journalists that “This provides recognition that we followed the procedures correctly.

Mr Adriaenssens resigned in protest at the seizure of the documents.

It is not clear what will now happen to the case files.

The Church Commission on Abuse by Clergymen no longer exists.

Mr Adriaenssens says that he has been led to believe that the case files will remain in sealed boxes until the Church decides what to do with them.

http://info-wars.org/2010/08/29/seize...-evidence/

How the church covered up for Father Kevin O’Donnell...

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:22:57 +1000

Tag: australia

How the church covered up for Father Kevin O’Donnell... until Broken Rites helped the victims.

By a Broken Rites researcher

One of Australia's most prolific child-abuse criminals, Father Kevin O'Donnell, was protected in the Melbourne Catholic archdiocese for fifty years. In his final years, he even received public praise from one of his superiors, Auxiliary Bishop George Pell.

Story Continues below

Please Help keep this site free by clicking on our sponsors

O'Donnell is dead but his numerous victims — and their families — still bear the scars of his crimes.

Father Kevin O'Donnell was a child abuser from 1942 to 1992. He fitted Masses, weddings and funerals in between his sex-abuse activities.

The Catholic Church now admits that O'Donnell was a child-abuser from day one. Broken Rites has seen a typed transcript of an interview that Mr Peter O'Callaghan QC (sex-abuse commissioner for the Melbourne archdiocese) had with an O'Donnell victim on 23 March 2003. In the transcript, Mr O'Callaghan commented that O'Donnell was engaged in sex abuse from the time he was ordained — and (said Mr O'Callaghan) he did it in every parish he was in.

During his career, the Melbourne church authorities were told of O'Donnell's crimes but chose to keep him in the ministry, thus inflicting him on further victims. Some of O'Donnell's fellow-priests knew that he was a danger to children but they remained silent. Certain other priests, when consulted by O'Donnell victims, just "didn't want to know about it".

Instead of sacking O'Donnell, the Melbourne archdiocese retained him in parish work until he retired gracefully from full-time ministry in 1992, aged 75, after clocking up his 50 years of sexual abuse. On his retirement, he was given a parting tribute by Archbishop Frank Little.

The archdiocese then conferred on him the distinguished title Pastor Emeritus (meaning "retired with honour") — despite his record of sexual abuse. In 1993, O'Donnell was still serving as a part-time relieving priest at several parishes.

Beginning in late 1993, Broken Rites exposed the church's cover-up of O'Donnell. In 1995, he pleaded guilty to child-sex crimes and was jailed.

But, even after he was jailed, the church authorities failed to remove him the priesthood. They continued to list "Reverend" Kevin O'Donnell (in the next edition of the annual Australian Catholic Directory) as a "supplementary priest of the Melbourne archdiocese".

And after he died in 1997, he was honoured by other priests at a church funeral and his remains were interred among the graves of fellow priests.

Thus, the church resolved to harbour "Father" O'Donnell for eternity.
Broken Rites research
When Broken Rites established a national phone hotline in September 1993, one of our first calls was from a Melbourne man ("Damian", born in 1960), who said he had been sexually abused while acting as an altar boy for Father Kevin O'Donnell in the 1970s.

Broken Rites began researching O'Donnell. We ascertained that John Kevin O'Donnell (usually called Kevin) was born in Melbourne on 22 October 1916, the eldest of five children. He was educated at Parade Christian Brothers College in East Melbourne and St Kevin's Christian Brothers' College in Toorak. He entered Melbourne's Corpus Christi seminary in 1935 to study for the priesthood. He was ordained for the Melbourne diocese at St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne, on 21 July 1942.

We found that he had been an assistant priest at South Melbourne in late 1942, Balaclava in 1943-44, Chelsea in 1944-49, Seymour 1949-56 and East Melbourne (St John the Evangelist parish) in 1956. He was then promoted to be the parish priest (i.e., in charge) at Dandenong 1956-69, Hastings 1969-76 and Oakleigh 1976-92.

In these later parishes, his career spanned the decades of Melbourne's outer-metropolitan population boom. Kevin O'Donnell was a shrewd businessman and fund-raiser. As outer-suburban property values started to rise with population growth, he found good real-estate investments. Using diocesan funds, he bought up bargain sites (e.g., broad acres or a dis-used factory) which the church could sell at a profit after the land increased in value.
He bought land later used for a parish church in Doveton (the Holy Family parish). He also bought a site for St John's College, Dandenong (conducted by the De La Salle Brothers and the Presentation Sisters).

A history book about the Dandenong parish (published in 1983) says: "While some parishioners may have looked askance at Fr O’Donnell’s land deals, time has proven the wisdom of his moves."
O’Donnell's victim "Damian" told Broken Rites in 1993: "The church authorities did well out of O'Donnell's business activities. Naturally, they protected him."

O'Donnell also helped to develop a retirement fund for priests. This made him an important figure among Melbourne priests.
Praise from George Pell

Broken Rites has obtained a video tape of a confirmation ceremony at Kevin O'Donnell's Sacred Heart parish in Oakleigh in 1989. On this tape, Auxiliary Bishop George Pell (then responsible for Melbourne’s southern suburbs, including O'Donnell's parish) praised the work of Father Kevin O'Donnell.

Near the end of the ceremony, Pell thanked all who helped to organise the ceremony. He then told the parishioners: "And I would like to congratulate Father Kevin [O'Donnell] and Father Michael for all the work they are doing here. It is obviously a great and strong parish with a proud Catholic tradition, and I know you will work to maintain this just as your priests do, and I look forward to many, many more years of work from Father O’Donnell in the church here."

Police charges

After hearing from Damian in late 1993, Broken Rites encouraged him to contact the Victoria Police sexual offences and child abuse unit, where Damian made a signed, sworn statement. Early in 1994, detectives made a surprise visit to O'Donnell at his house in Carrum. O'Donnell remembered Damian and did not deny the allegations.

In March 1994, police charged O'Donnell with indecent assault of Damian and summoned the priest to the Frankston Magistrates Court. Damian, accompanied by a Broken Rites representative, went to the Frankston Court that day but found that O’Donnell's lawyer had contacted the court registrar's office and had obtained an adjournment for a few months to prepare for the defence.
On 25 March 1994, a news item about the Damian charges appeared in the country edition of the Melbourne Herald Sun and later similar news items began appearing in regional weekly newspapers surrounding O'Donnell's former parishes. As a result, more victims phoned Broken Rites and/or the police. In several instances, a caller had presumed previously that he/she was the only victim (that is, it was an isolated offence) but now he/she realized that the scandal was far bigger. Some of these callers agreed to make a signed police statement but others refused a statement because they did not understand prosecution procedures. This meant that the eventual prosecution of O'Donnell would relate only to a small proportion of alleged victims.
The O'Donnell case was transferred to the Melbourne Magistrates Court, and John Kevin O'Donnell appeared there briefly on 7 September 1994, charged with 32 incidents of indecent assault at four parishes, involving seven boys and one girl. Broken Rites representatives were present in the courtroom.
O'Donnell figured prominently in that evening's Channel Nine news, with footage of him leaving the court building. Reports were published in local newspapers surrounding all of O’Donnell's former parishes. This resulted in still more victims contacting Broken Rites or the police.

At the September 7 hearing, O'Donnell was released on bail pending a further hearing, because the prosecutors knew that further victims were coming forward.

Support from fellow priests

After the September 7 hearing, a priest in one of his former parishes asked the congregation to "pray for Father O'Donnell" but did not mention the victims.

Some Melbourne priests in late 1994 discussed the possibility of issuing a joint public statement, supporting O'Donnell. However, a better-informed priest (who knew "Damian") warned his colleagues that massive evidence was mounting against O'Donnell, and this was likely to result in a conviction.

More victims

Melbourne newsrooms were kept informed about the next court date for the case. When Kevin O’Donnell came to court again in early 1995, he was charged with indecently assaulting 12 victims (ten boys, two girls), all aged between eight and 15, at each of the five main parishes (Chelsea, Seymour, Dandenong, Hastings and Oakleigh) in which O'Donnell served between 1946 and 1976.
The prosecution submitted documents in court, containing full details of the victims’ evidence.

A Broken Rites researcher (together with newspaper journalists) examined these documents at the court at the end of the proceedings.

According to the court file, each victim was assaulted numerous times, generally over several years.

These were not O'Donnell's only victims. These were merely the victims who were selected by the prosecutors for purposes of this court case.

And the time-span 1946-to-1976 does not mean that O'Donnell stopped offending in 1976. It merely reflects the fact that the first written complaint (from Damien in the Hastings parish in the early 1970s) was referred to the Hastings detectives' office for investigation. Damien told the Hastings detectives that he knew of other victims in the Hastings parish, and that O'Donnell had continued to associate with boys from O'Donnell's previous parish, Dandenong. The Hastings detectives then interviewed some (but not all) of O'Donnell's Dandenong victims. And, after the earliest media publicity, the Hastings detectives were also contacted by a few of O'Donnell's many victims at earlier parishes (Chelsea and Seymour), plus at least one victim from his final parish, Oakleigh. However, the Hasting detectives' investigation was focussed mainly on two parishes (Hastings and Dandenong), meaning that many victims from other parishes (including Oakleigh) were not interviewed.

And eventually the prosecuting authorities decided not to wait for more victims to be interviewed but to go to court immediately with the existing batch of signed victim statements.

The fact that most victims in this court case were males could be because the police were first contacted by a male victim (Damien), who referred the detectives to other male victims. Most of O'Donnell's countless victims remained silent, and it is not known how many of these silent victims were female.

The offences

The male victims, who served as O'Donnell's altar boys or in his scout troop, were assaulted in churches, presbyteries and cars and at drive-in cinemas and beaches. O'Donnell bribed them with money, gifts and favours.

O’Donnell would invade a boy's trousers and grope the boy's genitals, while O'Donnell masturbated himself, often rubbing his own genitals against the boy's bare body. This assault by O'Donnell could be a boy's first sexual experience and the fact that it was with a Catholic priest could leave the boy confused and feeling guilty.

Several victims said O'Donnell indicated that he wanted to penetrate them anally but the victims managed to evade this.
A victim would find it hard to stop being an altar boy or stop doing jobs at the presbytery, because his parents would want him to continue seeing the priest.

The earliest victim in the court case was "Brendan", who was aged eight in 1946 at St Joseph’s church in Chelsea. Many years later, long after O’Donnell had left Chelsea, Brendan got married in this parish. Brendan’s wife was not a Catholic, so the couple were not allowed to have their ceremony in front of the altar. The ceremony was shunted into a side room – the sacristy – which was the very room where Father O'Donnell used to assault Brendan.

Female victim complained to a priest

A female victim ("Mary", from the Seymour parish) was sexually abused for three years from the age of 13 when helping O'Donnell conduct late-afternoon catechism classes for State School children in the early 1950s. To escape O'Donnell, Mary entered a nunnery at 16 and remained a nun until she was 25. The loss of these vital years had a devastating effect on Mary’s later life.
Mary told police: "While I was still a nun, I told a Catholic priest, from the Jesuit order, about O'Donnell but he didn't want to know about it."

The other female victim was a sister of one of the male victims.
Church authorities knew
One victim, "Michael", from the Dandenong parish, said that he and his Scout leader officially reported O'Donnell's sexual abuse to the Vicar-General of the Melbourne archdiocese, Monsignor Laurence Moran, in 1958-59. Laurie Moran went to see O’Donnell about it.

Michael said: "A couple of days later, O’Donnell told me he knew I’d dobbed him in and his boss had been out to see him... He said it was only a problem he’d ever had with me, and it was because he loved me."

Michael says that, after this, Auxiliary Bishop Arthur Fox also interviewed him and urged him to remain silent about the sexual incidents.

For 35 years, Michael presumed that he was O’Donnell's only victim. But in early 1994 he was shocked to see the media reports about O’Donnell being charged with assaulting another boy [this was Damian, the victim who had contacted Broken Rites]. Michael then contacted the police, becoming the second victim to make a police statement.

Michael told the detectives in 1994 about his scoutmaster's 1959 complaint to the archdiocese. When O'Donnell was charged in 1994, O'Donnell was given details of the evidence against him, including the information about the scoutmaster. In October 1994, while church lawyers were considering how best to defend O'Donnell, the church's Melbourne vicar-general (Monsignor Gerry Cudmore) sent a priest to interview the scoutmaster. After this interview, the priest wrote to Cudmore on 31 October 1994 with some good news — the priest "assured" Cudmore that the scoutmaster does not intend to give evidence in the criminal proceedings. Thus, the church's cover-up would not be revealed in court.

The veil of secrecy

"Damian" (at the Hasting parish in the 1970s) said he was unable to tell his parents about O’Donnell's abuse because his parents were loyal Catholics and he did not want to upset them. When Damian got married in the early 1980s, his mother insisted that Father Kevin O'Donnell should perform the wedding. Damian reluctantly consented but he is still angry about this.

Damian said: "About 1986, I complained to two priests in other parishes that I had been molested by a priest but they didn't want to know the name of the offender. I also had some counselling in 1986 with a nun, who immediately wrote to the archdiocese about O'Donnell, but the archdiocese ignored the letter."
Damian eventually told his mother about O'Donnell and she wrote a letter of complaint to the archdiocese but the church authorities allowed O’Donnell to continue ministering at Oakleigh until he retired at age 75 in 1992.

Caught in bed

Another victim, "Alan", from Dandenong, said that a certain assistant priest saw him in bed with O'Donnell at the Dandenong presbytery. This assistant priest took no action, even though O'Donnell was obviously committing child-abuse. When Broken Rites checked the annual Catholic Directory in 2009, this silent priest was still in the ministry and was indeed in charge of a parish.
In 1993, after O'Donnell had retired from full-time work at Oakleigh, Alan was annoyed to find that O’Donnell was doing part-time relieving work — at the Dandenong parish. Alan complained to the archdiocese about O'Donnell's abusive history. A mediation meeting was held at the archdiocesan office, where Alan extracted an apology from O'Donnell. Alan forced the archdiocese to stop O'Donnell from acting as a relieving priest at Dandenong but later Alan discovered that O'Donnell was still doing relieving work in another diocese.

Simultaneous with this, in late 1993, Damian of Hasting parish was reporting O'Donnell to Broken Rites and the police. Damian was acting separately and did not know about Alan’s complaint to the church.

In 1994, after hearing that O'Donnell was being charged by police [because of Damian], Alan phoned the police and signed a statement.

While the O'Donnell case was before the courts in 1994-95, further victims telephoned Broken Rites but, for various reasons, some did not go to the police. Some callers said they knew of other victims.

Guilty plea

In early 1985. after discussions between the prosecutors and the church lawyers, O'Donnell pleaded guilty to one representative incident of indecent assault (that is, indecent touching) for each victim.

The prosecution dropped all the other incidents, including some more serious charges involved oral and digital penetration. The dropped charges would have incurred a longer jail sentence.
The guilty plea meant that O'Donnell was automatically convicted, and the case did not need to be argued out in court. Therefore, the victims were not required to appear in court, although several of them were present in court, with Broken Rites, as observers.

Pre-sentence hearing

On 4 August 1995, O'Donnell appeared in the Melbourne County Court for pre-sentence submissions, in which his lawyer requested a lenient non-jail sentence.

Melbourne priest Fr John Brosnan, who appeared as a "character" witness for O'Donnell, tried to elicit the court's sympathy for O’Donnell, describing his predatory behaviour as “a great affliction” which caused him to "suffer greatly". [Victims present in court said later: "What about the victims' suffering?"]

Sentenced

In the Melbourne County Court on 11 August 1995, Judge Murray Kellam sentenced John Kevin O'Donnell to a total of 39 months jail, with a minimum of 15 months behind bars before parole.
The twelve victims in this case were merely the few who contacted the police. Worldwide research has demonstrated that only a tiny minority of victims go to the police after being sexually abused in a church situation.

After the jailing, several O'Donnell supporters in the priesthood asked their congregations to pray for O'Donnell. These pastors did not express the same concern for O'Donnell's victims.
Until O'Donnell pleaded guilty, one of O'Donnell's fellow priests was claiming that O'Donnell was innocent. This priest was one of many who were an accessory in the O'Donnell cover-up. O'Donnell shattered this cover-up when he admitted his crimes in court.

Further victims

Channel Nine television news ran prominent coverage throughout the O'Donnell case — on 23 February 1995, 15 May 1995 and 4 August 1995.

With help from Broken Rites, the Melbourne "Herald Sun" published a three-page feature about the Kevin O'Donnell case on 5 August 1995, plus another article on 18 August 1995. The newspaper published the Broken Rites telephone number and this prompted more people to ring Broken Rites after the jailing to tell us of their experiences with O’Donnell in his various parishes during his 50-year career.

Instead of phoning Broken Rites, some other O'Donnell victims phoned the Melbourne archdiocesan office.

Offending to the very end

The charges in court were confined to offences between 1946 and 1976 but the additional complaints (after the court case) included children in his final parish, Oakleigh, up until O'Donnell's retirement in 1992.

One caller to Broken Rites was "Gary" (born 1972), who said he was molested by O'Donnell for some time in the Oakleigh parish in the mid-1980s, a decade later than the 12th victim in the court case. Gary had never been able to talk openly about O'Donnell but the detailed Herald Sun article gave him the opportunity to tell his shocked parents.

"Clive" (born about 1978) told Broken Rites in 2002 about being indecently groped by O’Donnell in the Oakleigh parish repeatedly from 1989 (when Clive was a pupil at the parish primary school) to 1992, when the priest retired. O'Donnell employed the boy to do jobs at the presbytery and also at O'Donnell's seaside holiday house. Clive was too afraid to tell his parents because they held Father O'Donnell in high regard. After O’Donnell was exposed in 1994, Clive's mother asked him about O’Donnell but Clive was still too embarrassed to admit having been abused.

Other Oakleigh parishioners told Broken Rites that O'Donnell used to have boys staying with him overnight at the presbytery there between 1976 and 1992. As before, O'Donnell's Oakleigh boys were given presents and favours to win them over. After O'Donnell retired from full-time parish work in 1992, he continued to associate with boys. In addition, he had access to girls at the Oakleigh parish primary school (see later in this article, regarding Emma and Katie).

Still a priest

O’Donnell was released from jail in late 1996. He was still listed as a priest in the mid-1996 Official Directory of the Catholic Church in Australia (in the Supplementary List of Diocesan Priests, page 142) and he still held the title of "Pastor Emeritus" (retired with honour).

A priestly funeral

O'Donnell died on 11 March 1997. A number of priests attended his funeral service.

It is believed that O’Donnell’s remains were then interred among the graves of other Melbourne priests at the Melbourne General Cemetery, Carlton. This cemetery contains a Catholic chapel, which includes special underground burial vaults for priests. This underground crypt — the final resting place for Melbourne’s priests — is closed to the public.

Thus, O’Donnell is still accepted and embraced by the church authorities as a priest.

His victims would prefer that he had been defrocked. Defrocking would be a sign that the church authorities had ceased tolerating child-sex criminals in its ministry.

And what happened to O'Donnell's estate? He owned a holiday house near Rosebud on Melbourne’s Mornington Peninsula, where he sometimes took boys and abused them. An interesting question is: after O’Donnell died, who pocketed the proceeds? O'Donnell certainly did not leave anything to his victims.

The story of Emma and Katie

The jailing of O'Donnell in 1995 caused much concern among families in his final parish, Oakleigh. The Vicar-General of the Melbourne Archdiocese (Monsignor Gerald Cudmore) expressed "concern" (in a letter to parishioners at Oakleigh, dated 18 July 1996) that apparently O'Donnell continued offending right up to the time of his retirement in 1992.

As well as being the Parish Priest, O'Donnell had also been the "chaplain" at Oakleigh's Sacred Heart Primary School. This role gave him the right to roam around the school and its playground. He could request to have any child sent to him to help him do chores at the church or in his presbytery. He also would see a child in private for "counselling".

One such child was Emma, whose years at Sacred Heart primary school co-incided with O'Donnell's final years there. Later, during the 1990s, Emma developed into a disturbed teenager and she eventually attempted suicide several times. After the jailing of O'Donnell, Emma disclosed that O'Donnell had sexually abused her at the primary school. Emma had remained silent about this during her school years because she knew that she was prohibited from saying anything negative about the clergy. O'Donnell's eventual disgracing removed this prohibition, leaving Emma free to make her disclosure.

Emma's parents (Anthony and Christine) were devastated. In the late 1990s, Anthony and Christine lodged a complaint with Melbourne archdiocesan sex-abuse commissioner Peter O'Callaghan QC.

After a thorough forensic examination of the case, Commissioner O'Callaghan officially ruled that Emma had indeed been sexually abused by O’Donnell. The archdiocese offered a written apology to Emma from Archbishop George Pell on behalf of the church.
Meanwhile, in the late 1990s, Anthony and Christine were alarmed to find that their second daughter, Katie, was having a disturbed adolescence, similar to Emma. Eventually it was ascertained that Katie, too, had had been sexually abused by O'Donnell when she was at the primary school. By the late 1990s, Katie had started drinking to numb the pain. In 1999, she walked in front of a speeding car, and this left her with permanent intellectual and physical disabilities. Katie now needs full-time supervision, with specialised helpers — an expensive on-going procedure.

The death of Emma

For 12 years after O'Donnell's jailing, Emma's parents battled to keep Emma alive as she sank into a spiral of self-destructive behaviour, including drug-taking. But in early January 2008, Emma died alone on her bedroom floor clutching her teddy bear, a treasured first birthday present from her parents. She was aged 26.

Her parents were told that the cause of death was a suspected drug overdose.

Emma's death and funeral were reported prominently in the Melbourne press and on the evening television news. Thus, parents throughout Victoria were warned about the negligence of the Melbourne Catholic archdiocese in allowing a sexually-abusive priest to remain in contact with children for 50 years.
Bishop Fisher's comment about Emma and Katie
In July 2008 (just six months after the death of Emma), Pope Benedict visited Sydney for the Catholic World Youth Day celebrations. Anthony and Christine flew to Sydney, hoping to meet the Pope, so that they could talk with him personally about what happened to their two daughters.

At a press conference in Sydney on 16 July 2008 (just six months after the death of Emma), reporters asked the World Youth Day co-ordinator (Bishop Anthony Fisher, of Sydney) for a comment specifically about the suffering of Anthony and Christine, who were grieving over the recent death of Emma.

Bishop Fisher (one of the four auxiliary bishops under Cardinal George Pell in Sydney) was dismissive, saying that people such as Anthony and Christine are "dwelling crankily on old wounds".
The bishop then went off to prepare for a re-enactment (in Sydney streets) of the crucifixion of Jesus, which occurred 2,000 years ago. That is, Bishop Fisher himself is "dwelling crankily on old wounds".

In January 2010, Auxiliary Bishop Fisher was promoted to become the bishop in charge of the Parramatta diocese, west of Sydney — while Father Kevin O'Donnell's many victims (and their families) in Victoria were still grieving over their "old wounds". In future, any church-abuse victims in the Parramatta diocese who wish to complain about their "old wounds" will have to deal ultimately with the dismissive Bishop Anthony Fisher.

O'Donnell's career

Broken Rites searched through 50 years of the annual Australian Catholic Directories to compile a list of all the parishes in which O'Donnell had an on-going full-time appointment. Here are the full names of those parishes:-

* South Melbourne (Saints Peter and Paul parish), briefly, in late 1942;
* Balaclava (St Colman's parish), 1943-4,
* Chelsea (St Joseph's, which was then part of Frankston parish), 1944-9;
* Seymour (Immaculate Conception parish), 1949-56;
* East Melbourne (St John the Evangelist church, Victoria Parade, which was attached to the Cathedral parish), 1956;
* Dandenong (St Mary's parish), 1956-69;
* Hastings (Immaculate Conception parish), 1969-76; and
* Oakleigh (Sacred Heart parish), 1976-92.

O’Donnell's victims were not confined to those parishes. For example, while he was at Oakleigh parish in the late 1970s, O’Donnell evidently molested a boy who was attending a Catholic primary school in a neighbouring suburb (not Oakleigh). In September 1994, this ex-pupil (Mr D) served a a statement of complaint upon the Melbourne archdiocese (Broken Rites possesses a copy of the statement.) Mr D said the relationship began when O’Donnell attended the school to say Mass.
The above parishes were not the only ones in which O'Donnell ministered. He is likely to have visited other parishes from time to time. And after he officially retired from the Oakleigh parish in 1992, he acted as a relieving priest in other parishes.
Kevin O’Donnell served under four Melbourne archbishops:

* Daniel Mannix, 1942-1963;
* Justin Simonds, 1963-1967;
* James Knox, 1967-1974; and
* Thomas Francis Little (Sir Frank Little), 1974 onwards.

O'Donnell was also subject to supervision by the Vicar-General of the archdiocese and, in later years, by an auxiliary bishop. O'Donnell's final auxiliary bishop was George Pell, who was responsible for Melbourne's southern parishes (including Oakleigh) from 1987.

O'Donnell sometimes operated outside the Melbourne archdiocese. In the 1960s, he had overseas trips, acting as a chaplain on ships bringing migrants to Australia. This role would have given him opportunities for misbehavior, with freedom from exposure.

According to evidence in court, O'Donnell also acted as a part-time army chaplain in the 1950s while he was stationed at Seymour (near the Puckapunyal army camp, where many 18-year-old conscripted National Service youths were being trained).

Broken Rites will continue to do research on O'Donnell and the church's cover-up.

http://resteralecoute.blogspot.com/20...kevin.html

Church fails to verify priest’s status

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:36:06 +1000

Tag: usa
Tag: philippines

By Shaun Hittle

New statements from Catholic Church officials fail to verify the status of a former Kansas priest who was “credibly accused” of sexual abuse.

Story Continues below

Please Help keep this site free by clicking on our sponsors

Orestes Huerta, a Catholic priest who served temporarily in the Dodge City diocese, was named by church officials last May as one of three priests who had worked in the diocese and had “credible” allegations of sexual abuse of minors made against them.

In July, a Journal-World article revealed that when Huerta left the United States, he returned to the Phillipines, where he remains in active ministry with the Diocese of Boac.

On Tuesday, an article by the Catholic News Service reported that the bishop of Boac said he would not investigate sexual abuse allegations made against Huerta “based on hazy and unverified reports from the Internet.”

In a phone interview, Reynaldo Evangelista, bishop of Boac diocese, told the Journal-World that Huerta did not have a pastoral assignment, but resided at a diocesan pastoral center and continues to perform Mass. However, Evangelista would not comment on allegations of sexual abuse against Huerta and would not say whether Huerta is prohibited from contact with children.

Huerta’s case, detailed as part of a follow-up to a Journal-World feature in June on sexual abuse in the Kansas Catholic Church, highlights a loophole in reforms within the church designed to address sexual abuse, said Teresa Kettelkamp, director of the U.S. Catholic Conference of Bishops. Kettelkamp’s organization created the current reforms in the church following the national sexual abuse scandal in 2002.

In the U.S., if allegations of sexual abuse committed by a priest are substantiated by an independent review board, that priest is removed from ministry. That does not pertain to dioceses in other countries, Kettelkamp said.

“They flee. ... They run back,” said Kettelkamp of priests who leave the U.S. after sexual abuse allegations surface.

That situation could place more children in danger, she said. “If (a priest) does have a pedophiliac mindset, he’s not going to stop,” she said. “That’s what predators do.”

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2010/aug...ts-status/